Cardiogenic Shock vs CHF Exacerbation: Telling Them Apart Fast

Pump failure with and without hypotension — assessment findings, CPAP decisions, and why fluid boluses can be harmful.

December 11, 2026 · 8 min read

Both are pump problems. The blood pressure decides your treatment path.

Shared findings

Crackles, orthopnea, JVD, peripheral edema, pink frothy sputum in severe cases, and a history of heart failure or prior MI.

The dividing line

  • CHF exacerbation: normal or elevated blood pressure, work of breathing is the problem
  • Cardiogenic shock: hypotension with poor perfusion, cool clammy skin, altered mentation

Treating CHF with adequate pressure

  1. Sit the patient upright
  2. CPAP 5–10 cm H2O — the single highest-yield intervention
  3. Nitroglycerin per protocol to reduce preload and afterload
  4. Continuous 12-lead monitoring for an ischemic trigger

Treating cardiogenic shock

Avoid large fluid boluses; the ventricle is already overloaded. Small 250 mL challenges only if the lungs are dry. Start norepinephrine or dopamine per protocol, keep oxygenation adequate, and transport to a center capable of catheterization.

Exam trap

A hypotensive patient with crackles is not a candidate for a 1-liter bolus. Recognizing that distinction is exactly what these questions test.

Ready to practice?

Turn reading into recall.

Free 10-question sample test on every certification track.

Try a free sample →